|06-22-2006, 01:10 PM||#16|
Recovering Gadget Addict
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Actually, Adobe is a big part of this, and Bill McCoy has expressed his enthusiasm of the new zip-based container spec. I haven't seen the Sony name, but despite their history I wouldn't give up on them completely and for all time.
DRM has not been addressed yet, so each company has freedom to add that as they see fit. That also means that interoperability at the consumer level can still be out of reach at the moment for DRM'd material. But based on my limited understand so far, it seems that this is a huge step forward, both because industry leaders are working together, and because developments like this would appear to be a prerequisite for any hope of a good interoperable DRM solution.
|06-22-2006, 01:36 PM||#17|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Nook STGR
This is why I'm not categorically opposed to the very concept.
However, you are quite correct that some "providers" see DRM as a method to force their customers to remain only their customers forever. It's been tried various ways throughout the centuries again and again and it's never worked for long. Heck, it hasn't even worked for Sony lately -- you'd think they'd notice that at some point.
For the pulishers & authors, volume sales are profit -- they need to sell as many books as they can so that ~$1.35/unit they clear and share between them will add up to something worthwhile. Actually they need to do that just to stay afloat.
Their resistance to e-books has been based in their fear that they'll sell one copy and it will be duplicated to all of those who would otherwise buy the thing, and the Pubs would end up with nothing. The fact that actual Publishers are getting on board with this initiative is encouraging, because it means that they have started to see the money through the haze of their piracy fears.
DRM which allows me to do anything with an e-book that I can with a paper one (lend, sell, read, etc.), is not what I'd consider restrictive. The reason I see this development as a hopeful sign is that if a universal format is implemented, then some sort of universal DRM is likely to follow. That leaves us reading any book on any platform, and only the single front battle to convince the publishers that they don't need to require a DNA sample to open the text up for reading.
BTW, I'll be out of touch for a couple of weeks, so don't be alarmed if y'all don't hear from me for a while.
Sure wish I had a nice e-ink reader to take on this trip.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|WSJ: Book Industry Turns the Page||recycledelectron||News||2||03-11-2009 12:56 PM|
|Fictionwise adopts libprs500 for Sony LRF e-book conversion||RWood||Sony Reader||42||09-06-2007 12:58 PM|
|May 2nd conference call on the new IDPF e-book standards||Bob Russell||News||0||04-21-2007 09:32 AM|
|E-book industry counts on cell phones||TadW||News||1||06-28-2006 09:28 AM|