|10-28-2012, 10:46 AM||#46|
What did you call me?
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Well, the Registrar has spoken: "No exemption for you!"
Oh well. As I read it, it comes down to this:
If we want this matter made clear by the next rule-making cycle, we'll need:
1. New laws. Write your congressman. (A really good law would obviate the need for an exemption.)
2. Cases that come to court and are decided in our favor, so there is a precedent for the Registrar to base an exemption on.
3. A lawyer to make a compelling legal argument on our behalf.
'Cuz, while it was indeed nice to see that our individual comments were being considered, the Registrar said they were just our stated opinions, not a legal analysis, and no proof that the uses we're discussing were indeed non-infringing or fair use. Note that they didn't say they WEREN'T, just that we didn't prove they WERE.
Last edited by ApK; 10-28-2012 at 10:48 AM.
|10-28-2012, 11:49 AM||#47|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|US Copyright Office ruled that jail breaking is FAIR USE.||snipenekkid||News||23||03-04-2011 02:26 AM|
|BBC Radio 'Thinking Allowed' on copyright||Sparrow||News||5||03-05-2009 08:34 PM|
|Who is allowed to use ePub DRM?||alehel||ePub||9||01-05-2009 11:26 AM|
|Government US Copyright Office: Report on Orphan Works. US Copyright Office. PDF||Nate the great||Other Books||0||01-03-2008 08:16 PM|