08-14-2012, 01:37 AM | #46 |
Fanatic
Posts: 519
Karma: 2693434
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Australia
Device: Cybook Gen 3, Pocketbook 902, Sony 650
|
|
08-14-2012, 01:43 AM | #47 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 519
Karma: 2693434
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Australia
Device: Cybook Gen 3, Pocketbook 902, Sony 650
|
Quote:
Secondly, what about the innocent donee? Is it OK for him to copy the book? |
|
08-14-2012, 05:04 AM | #48 |
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Karma: 10
Join Date: Jul 2011
Device: Kindle 3G
|
Random House maintains an archive of out of print books, which they will photocopy/scan for a price per page (I think it's 10p). About a year ago I was looking for a long out of print book (I found one copy for sale at around $250) and they were able to hook me up. They required I sign a form stating that the scanned book is for personal use only, and that I would not give it to anyone else. I suspect that I could have arranged a discounted group purchase if I thought other people wanted to read it as well.
The Random House archive is here: http://archive.randomhouse.co.uk/ I'm certain that other publishers have similar systems in place and would be very glad to take your money. |
08-15-2012, 04:28 AM | #49 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,646
Karma: 306652114
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Quote:
In the second case, one has paid (through taxes) for communal, temporary access to a limited number of copies of the work. Making an additional copy of the work to gain permanent access to a copy of the work without further compensating the author is unethical. If everyone did the first, no-one would suffer any loss of revenue. If everyone did the second, there would be a large enough loss of revenue that it would no longer be economically viable to make books available to libraries. |
|
08-15-2012, 05:50 AM | #50 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 519
Karma: 2693434
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Australia
Device: Cybook Gen 3, Pocketbook 902, Sony 650
|
Quote:
What you are saying is that it is ethical to buy a 2nd-hand out of print book and to make a copy for your own purposes without further compensating the author; but that is unethical to borrow the book from a library and make a copy for your own purposes unless you do further compensate the author. |
|
08-15-2012, 10:09 AM | #51 | |
temp. out of service
Posts: 2,794
Karma: 24285242
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Duisburg (DE)
Device: PB 623
|
Quote:
The author has already been rewarded for allowing the existence of this singular copy in circulation. Additional personal copies have no influence on the amount of the supply-demand circulation/ecosystem (? feel free to help me out with an expression here) the personal copies exist only in your personal sphere of influence, they are not in commercial or otherwise public circulation but if you temporarily take an item meant to return into circulation as with library items. (where the author has been and in many cases still is compensated for said circulation: depending on the locally valid laws authors get money based on library circulation) Making a permanent copy without ownership of the original makes you 'cheating' insofar that you work around your need of having an own copy i.e. a kind of copy for which the author should have been separately compensated by abusing a copy in public circulation of which only temporary possession and no ownership (library) was granted to you. The point that matters is: do your multiplications of the material affect supply and demand of others and by this affecting the authors revenues? The right to a personal copy can only be derived from possession of a "personal original" what in case of a library-owned original, temporarily released into your possesion only (possesion is only factual control no legal ownership) isn't given. I'm sure it could be explained less complicated, sorry. Seems to be one of mine "hit your linguistic limits" - day. |
|
08-15-2012, 10:20 AM | #52 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,646
Karma: 306652114
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Quote:
If you buy a 2nd-hand out of print book and retain it, you reduce the supply of 2nd-hand copies of that book. If the second-hand market runs low and demand increases, some publisher might investigate the possibility of a new print run. Again, look at what happens if everyone does it. If people buy up second-hand copies and retain them (even if they also make personal-use copies as well), the chances of a new print run or a new edition are quite high. If people just borrow the existing copies from libraries and make copies for themselves before returning the book to the library, there is no chance of a new print run or a new edition. |
|
08-15-2012, 10:46 AM | #53 |
temp. out of service
Posts: 2,794
Karma: 24285242
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Duisburg (DE)
Device: PB 623
|
Thanks Paul. That's what I meant.
Creating ownership out of the less persistent temporary possession wrecks demand. |
08-15-2012, 01:24 PM | #54 |
King of the Bongo Drums
Posts: 1,622
Karma: 5927225
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Excelsior! (Strange...)
|
It appears to me that all of the discussion bearing on the ethics of copying are couched in terms of the creator's right to make money off of the sale of the book.
It seems to me that if a book has been allowed to go out of print, it amounts to an abandonment the right to make a profit. Now, there could be some quibbling about this point, as when the author still wants to sell the book but can't find anyone who will publish it. But on the whole, I think it is reasonable to suppose that a book goes out of print because there's no longer any profit to be made. So if a book is out of print, I have no problem with copying it in any fashion, unless there is some other right that is being violated. And I don't see that any other moral right has been advanced for out of print books. But if the book is still in print, there's obviously a continuing intent by the author/publisher to profit from sales, and it is unethical to, in essence, steal that right to profit. So it appears to me that making a copy of the book is ethical only if you have personally bought a copy, which respects that right. From this perspective, it seems to me that making a copy of a library book, where the book is still in print and you can buy one yourself, is not ethical. Basically, when you copy the library book, you are not copying a book you have bought. You are copying a book someone else bought. You have no more ethical right to do that than you have to copy your friend's purchased copy. Making a copy of a library book is not time-shifting, although it might seem to be so superficially. Timeshifting involves your right to make a copy of something that the creator has sold you, even if he has sold it to you for free, as with a TV program. But the creator has not sold you the library book. He has sold the book to the library. Even assuming that in the sales agreement, the creator did not restrict the right to copy, it is only the library which has the right to timeshift. So in my view, you can ethically copy a book which is no longer in print, but you can't copy one that is in print unless you buy your own copy. |
08-15-2012, 02:21 PM | #55 | |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,646
Karma: 306652114
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2012, 02:58 PM | #56 | |
Fanatic
Posts: 553
Karma: 1234566
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver, WA
Device: Sony PRS-T1, & Kobo Mini
|
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2012, 03:47 PM | #57 | |
Grand Sorcerer
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
|
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2012, 03:59 PM | #58 |
The Grand Mouse 高貴的老鼠
Posts: 71,646
Karma: 306652114
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Norfolk, England
Device: Kindle Voyage
|
|
08-15-2012, 04:20 PM | #59 | |
King of the Bongo Drums
Posts: 1,622
Karma: 5927225
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Excelsior! (Strange...)
|
Quote:
On point two, I think that would be useful feedback, but it appears to me that it would take much more effort than it is worth. I expect it would make the author feel better, though, so it would be a nice thing to do. On point three, I think that the ethical obligation is to buy it rather than copy it, if it is available for purchase when you want it or need it. But if the author/publisher has not made it available at that point, I see no ethical need to reward them when they change their mind. You might want to do that as practical encouragement, though! |
|
08-15-2012, 04:40 PM | #60 |
King of the Bongo Drums
Posts: 1,622
Karma: 5927225
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Excelsior! (Strange...)
|
The purpose of the copyright laws is not merely to maximize the creator's profits. It is also to make books available to the public. So when the book is out of print because Disney is manipulating the market, I don't see what difference that - or any other - reason makes. Out of print is out of print.
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Possible to print a listing of books? | TdeV | Library Management | 13 | 06-17-2011 10:12 AM |
Amazon Now Selling More Kindle Books Than All Print Books | =X= | News | 27 | 05-24-2011 08:05 AM |
E-Books Outsell Print Books at Amazon - NY Times | KenIsaacson | News | 1 | 05-20-2011 07:52 AM |
print a list of my books? | StickMaker | Amazon Kindle | 11 | 03-04-2011 10:34 AM |
Releasing Out of Print Books? | KindleKid | Reading Recommendations | 6 | 12-05-2008 03:24 PM |