|
|
#76 |
|
Guru
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 821
Karma: 2637377
Join Date: Nov 2010
Device: PRS-650 / Cybook Opus
|
Fight Club? Interesting...but I think they are just very different. The chapter in the book about what he put in the food when he worked as a waiter...well, it's not in the film. LOTR? OMG, sacrilege! What! ![]() ![]() ![]() I liked the first film very much, but after that they went down hard. To compare to the book? Ludicrous! They should have made six separate movies faithfully mapped to the original six books. All that story-line flipping made me dizzy. BTW you need to read the Silmarillion and the Lost Tales to appreciate the poetry and just who Gilgalad was and why you should care
__________________
Just do it - Marlon Brando on acting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 28
Karma: 62792
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Device: none
|
Film better than the book? Only one that comes to mind is The Graduate. I complained how dull it was to a friend [science fiction writer A. Bertram Chandler] and he just puffed on his pipe and said in his experience bad novels often made good movies and vice versa!
On consideration, I do remember that the movie PBS made of Ursula K. LeGuin's The Lathe of Heaven was slightly different to the novel but the differences were improvements for once. |
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 48
Karma: 45968
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Keyboard 3G
|
The Shawshank Redemption I thought worked much better as a film, though I did enjoy the book immensely and would rather like to read it again some time.
Lord of the Rings is a tricky one - the films (...has to be the extended editions!) are superb, though a touch cheesy in some places. I think the books are better but definitely lean towards a bit too much poetry (which I also tend to skim through after reading some of it) and exposition - you can really tell that Tolkien was an English professor! The books give much more of an impression of scale of the lands and the task at hand than the films do but the films are excellent and keep the important aspects of the story intact - trying to fit the sheer scope of the books into three films must have been a herculean task. I've watched the extra material on the extended editions (in all there are 9 dvds of documentaries on the blu-ray set!!) and the amount of work and attention to detail they put into the films is quite astonishing - they had people working for years making chainmail! Oh, and I saw the Fellowship of the Ring before I'd read the books - I certainly prefer the flow of the first book, even though I'm not actually terribly keen on Tom Bombadil. I agree about High Fidelity too, I saw the film and thought it was fantastic but the book just left me cold. I've read another of his books and quite liked it but that one just didn't work as well as the film did for me. Last edited by Fozzybear; 02-19-2012 at 01:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,446
Karma: 2827758
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: NYC
Device: Sony 650
|
I have to disagree on One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. I read the book three times, I loved it so much, and then saw the movie many years later. It is a very good movie, certainly Nicholson is phenomenal. I appreciate that the movie stands on its own as a great movie. But the book is still one of my very favorite books, with a different message from the movie.
Which leads me to a theory. For those who said the movie was better than the book, which did you see/read first, the book or the movie? I'm thinking you can only like the movie best if you saw the movie first. Agree, disagree? eP |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
The Night Was Moist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 177
Karma: 1018844
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: toronto, canada
Device: kobo,kindle,supernova, playbook
|
agree 100%... also 'get shorty' by elmore leonard.
Last edited by hard-boiled pat; 02-19-2012 at 05:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 | |
|
Kate
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,442
Karma: 1756285
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon, United States
Device: Nexus 7, Sony PRS-T1 Red
|
Quote:
I think whichever you experience first might prejudice you a bit, but if your judgment is still intact, you ought to be able to judge each on its own merits. On the other hand, I've yet to see a film version of 'Little Women' that even began to do the book justice, although the TV version starring Susan Dey came by far the closest. LOTR is kind of a Rorschach test - some people LOVE the books, some are completely bored by them. Some of the same people who dislike the books might love the movies, some who love the books might hate the movies (although I've met very few of the latter category). Me, I think the movies are awe-inspiring achievements of film, but I still think the book was better because of the level of detail and because Tolkien's philosophy is clearer. Tolkien's writing is quite Victorian in tone - doesn't bother me because I read of lot of Victorian lit anyway, but for those with more 'modern' tastes I can see where they might find it draggy. But then I find much of modern lit *too* stripped down. When there's nothing left but plot, then there's nothing left worth reading, IMHO.
__________________
Kate My Webpage Portrait of the Past They Say Love is Blind Now available from Girlebooks.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Grand Scheme of Things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 1,215
Karma: 9838441
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Near a Tim Hortons, most likely.
Device: Sony PRS-T2 (Black)
|
As far as LOTR is concerned. I think the movie and the film are both brilliant, but clearly different.
There are parts of the novel that I couldn't stand, and parts of the movie that I thought were sappy and overdone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,191
Karma: 39866013
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Triad
Device: Paperwhite
|
But the A&E remake with James Caan and Lukas Haas was not only bad but, though the plot was similar,the point the movie seemed to be making was the complete opposite of what the book was all about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Evangelist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 484
Karma: 746472
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Deep in Maryland
Device: Android G1
|
Kick Ass the movie was much more fun and joyful tribute to over-the-top Superheroics and unashamed comic book violence that I felt the actually comic was. The comic book was actually fairly depressing and ended on a low note.
__________________
The Tether Saga - Dark Fantasy on the Streets Of Baltimore (Learn More Here) The Wonder Tales - All Ages Fantasy Adventure (Learn More Here) A Teddy Bear Tale - Tristan the Teddy Bear protecting his child from the Monsters under the bed (Learn More Here) Learn more about Nick Davis at alt-world.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
The Night Was Moist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 177
Karma: 1018844
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: toronto, canada
Device: kobo,kindle,supernova, playbook
|
Quote:
closest i came was watching a spoof of it on a simpsons halloween special. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Groupie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 182
Karma: 1316076
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Device: iPad
|
I was disappointed by The Shining (the movie) at the time. I was a big fan of the book and didn't think the movie measured up.
If you want a King book that was better as a movie, I think Carrie (original, haven't seen the remake) is a better example. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
The Night Was Moist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 177
Karma: 1018844
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: toronto, canada
Device: kobo,kindle,supernova, playbook
|
i agree, also pet semetary was a good adaptation in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 48
Karma: 45968
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Keyboard 3G
|
Quote:
![]() I remember reading a movie novelization once, I think it was Terminator 2 (!), and the only thing I can remember is that every time the author wanted to add a dramatic emphasis it involved something 'which missed him by inches!' - it was awful! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Wizard
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 3,430
Karma: 23003297
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
|
I've always liked the book better independent of what I've seen/read first. But you could make a poll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Fanatic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Posts: 587
Karma: 7511929
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York, NY
Device: Amazon Kindle Touch, Microsoft Surface RT
|
Movies were better:
Children of Men Breakfast at Tiffany's (close one, could be because I saw the movie first) Fight Club (close one, could be because I saw the movie first) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best films of 2011 so far | markbot | Lounge | 34 | 12-26-2011 07:00 PM |
| Twitch Films | scifiguy51 | Recipes | 2 | 09-15-2011 08:54 AM |
| What are some of the better book to film adaptions out there? | happy_terd | Lounge | 45 | 03-01-2010 09:53 AM |
| Kevin Kelly's "True Films" 3.0 free e-book download | TadW | Deals, Freebies, and Resources (No Self-Promotion) | 2 | 01-15-2008 06:58 AM |
| Is anybody into asian films? | harajukuchic | Lounge | 7 | 03-29-2005 04:43 PM |