|08-06-2010, 09:26 PM||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Laptop, iPad, Nook, Kindle
Dorchester Dropping Mass Market for E-books & Pod
I hope this works out, but I have misgivings. Dorchester has had financial troubles lately, and this sounds more like desperation than the future of publishing. Also, from what I have heard, their e-book royalties are not very good. On top of that, authors (and readers!) were hit with this without any warning. Many authors have spent their own money promoting an upcoming print book, only to find out that the print edition has been delayed over six months and will be in trade paperback.
They also had a subscription plan where readers could sign up to get all their new horror titles or all their new romance titles or whatever by month. This will throw that into chaos -- or rather, even more chaos.
I'm also annoyed because there were some horror novels I was looking forward to buying in the fall. I hope the e-books will become available when the mass market paperbacks were supposed to come out, but we know that isn't always the case.
Last edited by Critteranne; 08-06-2010 at 09:28 PM. Reason: Adding Tags
|08-07-2010, 05:38 PM||#2|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Kobo, Kindle 3, Paperwhite
Dorchester Publishing (aka Leisure Books, Love Spell) has been a great source of books for the genre fans, but they're kinda low rung for authors. It'll be interesting to see what kind of deal they make their authors.
|08-07-2010, 07:10 PM||#3|
Join Date: Aug 2009
I agree this smacks of desperation. They've been having trouble paying their authors for a while. Back in January they raised eyebrows when they sold off the front and back list of some of their biggest authors to a competitor.
The only genre that does really well in ebook form is romance but there are a number of established ebook houses specialising in romance already. Dorchester hasn't shown that they have any idea how to market ebooks or maintain a decent web presence - just look at their website, it's awful.
There's some further reading here:
|08-08-2010, 10:20 AM||#4|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rainier, WA
Device: Nook WiFi
What many of these publishing houses need to do is cut their overhead. Move out of NY. Get rid of the current program of returns. I'm curious too, I know an awful lot of POD is done in a trade paperback size, but I wonder why it couldn't be used to do mass market paperback sized books?
|08-08-2010, 05:46 PM||#5|
Join Date: May 2008
Device: EB1150, iPhone, Cool-er Purple, Pocketbook 360, Kindle Fire
Yeah I do think that publishing houses could get rid of overhead by relocating and perhaps getting rid of some of their staff.
I think that they are just feeling bewildered by ebooks and how marketing and distribution is changing.
Paperback book sales are down, the local Borders here is struggling, the Barnes and Noble is not struggling as much, but it has a large store and most likely an expensive lease. These things make it hard for the B&M stores to keep up with online retailers.
The difference between trade paperbacks and mass market pbacks is not just about size. The paper is also thicker. I think it would be harder for POD places to print mass market style pbacks. Smaller is not always easier. Though I imagine as the POD market matures more the cost to print a paperback will go down.
|08-08-2010, 10:04 PM||#6|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Device: Kindle 4 No Touchie
The real problem, for those who didn't bother to read the article, is that sales have tanked and are down 25%.
Relocating won't do jack for Dorchester. If they move to Iowa, sure they'll pay less in rent, but they won't be able to find as many editors, proofreaders or marketing staff, and will be isolated from the agents and critics and other networks that are critical to selling books.
Any possible "savings" will be blown by flying constantly to major cities and putting their people up in hotels, as well as costs associated with the move. Not to mention they'd lose huge numbers of staff. Would you move from New York City to Iowa to work for a company that lost 1/4 of its revenues in a single year? And can you imagine the level of disruption of cutting paper and moving and dealing with huge losses of revenue all at once?
Beyond switching to POD, eliminating returns is not an option for paper. If you tell distributors and bookstores you will no longer take returns, they won't take your books period.
|08-09-2010, 03:58 PM||#7|
Has got to the black veil
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southeastern Pennsylvania
Device: Nook Color, Nook Simple Touch
Of course, by the same token, if they succeed, it will be pretty good for the digital-first crowd.
I wish Dorchester and their authors well. I don't like to see any company fail in this economy.
Last edited by MaggieScratch; 08-09-2010 at 04:01 PM.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Free books (Kobo, Borders) - 2 Dorchester Romance, 1 Pulp & more [some US-only]||ATDrake||Deals, Freebies, and Resources (No Self-Promotion)||2||10-05-2010 05:33 AM|
|Free books (Kobo) - 20 Dorchester Publishing Books (Romance, Horror, Thriller etc.)||ATDrake||Deals, Freebies, and Resources (No Self-Promotion)||15||09-24-2010 08:01 PM|
|US Verlag Dorchester - E-Books & Print on Demand only||Verres||Deutsches Forum||1||08-11-2010 07:26 AM|
|Will ebooks become the new mass market paperback?||Falbe Publishing||News||8||09-18-2008 02:40 AM|
|AP article snubs e-books for POD||Steven Lyle Jordan||News||2||01-02-2008 02:00 PM|