View Single Post
Old 11-04-2011, 02:54 PM   #13
Kevin8or
Guru
Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Kevin8or ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Kevin8or's Avatar
 
Posts: 977
Karma: 43409226
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Device: Kindle 3
The biggest issue in mass digitization, IMHO, is the unconscionable lengths to which copyright's been extended. I hoped that the Google Books litigation would bring the problem into focus.

[U.S. example follows but other countries are similar, AFAIK]

The US Constitution grants Congress the power "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

With that authority, Congress passed the Copyright Act of 1790, which granted a right of 14 years, and an optional extension of a second 14 years. It was a balance between authors' compensation and public enrichment.

In 1909, Congress doubled it to two 28-year terms. In 1976 Congress extended it to life + 50 years. As it now stands, the copyright term is:

life + 70 years for individuals, and 120 years for corporations.

From a maximum of 28 years to the present 120 years. The duration is all out of proportion to the purpose: to promote the public good.
Kevin8or is offline   Reply With Quote