Thread: Amazon's Silk Browser Acceleration Tested: Less Bandwidth Consumed, But Slower Perfor
View Single Post
Old 11-24-2011, 11:48 AM   #2
ectoplasm
Addict
ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ectoplasm ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 255
Karma: 1151364
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: Aura HD and H2O
Looks like even the best case scenario, there could only be a small gain. So it does seem like a lot of trouble for either a small gain, or no gain. I wonder if there is additional motive to Amazon capturing every page you visit.
ectoplasm is offline   Reply With Quote