I agree with JSWolf: the poll need to be closed; I wasn't going to vote because I've already read the winner (I think we can call it that way already).
But I dislike this solution
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf
Well, if we want to give a go to a hidden vote for November, I can take votes via PM as long as the vote closes before October 29.
|
There will always be an opening to distrust.
It's possible to let the poll system without showing the results?
If not, I prefer to keep the way it is now.