Quote:
Originally Posted by GlenBarrington
Doesn't matter in my mind, as long as people are free to set up alternate methods of distribution, there is no censorship. Ms Reisman has the right to speak for her company and has no moral obligation to help distribute speech she finds immoral. You have a right to the freedom of speech, you don't have the right to force people to help you distribute your speech against their will.
|
Great arguments, I agree with them. I think the interesting thing is how to find that moral balance between what is offensive to some, but historically important to others, I wonder how this is being dealt with in the US with Mein Kampf for example?