Quote:
Originally Posted by ibu
I've never heard the term "semantic size".
I'm not quite sure, what you want to express with using that term.
|
I mean to express a core part of the CSS spec that deals with
font size. If you're going to tinker with CSS, you should know about this. They call it "absolute size," but it's a semantic designation:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSS2 specification
<absolute-size>
An <absolute-size> keyword is an index to a table of font sizes computed and kept by the UA. Possible values are:
[ xx-small | x-small | small | medium | large | x-large | xx-large ]
The following table provides user agent guidelines for the absolute-size mapping to HTML heading and absolute font-sizes. The 'medium' value is the user's preferred font size and is used as the reference middle value.
|
See also "smaller" and "larger", which mean "go up/down one size."
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibu
I know that each user has on each device one single ergonomic size for a specific font. For "running text" (not sure what's the correct typografic jargon in english).
|
False, as noted above. Every UA - that's
User
Agent, whether we're talking about a browser, dedicated e-reader, or app - is expected to maintain
seven distinct sizes, although six of them are usually calculated from one "normal size" baseline. The ratio between them can vary between UAs, and using the UA's interface to say "make it smaller" or "make it larger" affects
all seven sizes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ibu
That's the simple reason, why every font-size rules in digital media for running text other than "1em" is evil.
|
You
are aware that defining text as being "1em" in size is pointless, right?