View Single Post
Old 02-06-2013, 04:14 AM   #74
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jozawun View Post
A flat denial of drug use is not necessary to found a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation. As I explained previously, a statement may be technically true but may tell only half the story. If a statement of fact excludes information which would significantly alter the interpretation of this fact, then a misrepresentation may have occurred.
Then you could sue every politician who has ever opened their mouth.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote