View Single Post
Old 08-29-2012, 03:25 PM   #24
Graham
Wizard
Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Graham ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,743
Karma: 32912427
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Yorkshire, UK
Device: Kobo H20, Pixel 2, Samsung Chromebook Plus
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotiaBurrell View Post
New HTC Android tablet. Again...copying.
Scotia, sometimes it's hard to tell whether you're being sarcastic or not!

But in a related development, since the jury decided that the Galaxy Tab did not infringe on the iPad design, Samsung have moved to get the injunction against Tab sales in the US lifted as soon as possible:

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?s...20827143911783

Quote:
For whatever reason seemed good to [the jury], they didn't find the Galaxy Tab 10.1 infringing Apple's 'D889 patent. And that was the only one that the District Court judge and the Federal Circuit thought should be blocked by an injunction pending the outcome of the trial. Neither the judge nor the Federal Circuit seemed to think the other Apple patents were likely to prevail, but with this jury, the Alice in Wonderland of juries as I think of them, it was the opposite.
Graham
Graham is offline   Reply With Quote