Quote:
|
In comparison, the new screen mentioned above draws 3 mW while displaying a static image. That means that when it’s not in heavy use (reading, for example) this screen is 800 times more efficient than the one on the iPad 2.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quexos
Unfortunately the reason we would want these as e-readers would precisely be to "read", a heavy use according to the article.
So I wonder what the real consumption and battery range would be should this technology hit the stores. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
In the meantime ...  |
I think that quote was supposed to mean reading was an example of the device when it's not in heavy use, presumably because you only change the screen every minute or two.
Andrew