View Single Post
Old 01-16-2013, 09:48 AM   #60
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
My point still holds - if a competitor knows Apple is bound to confirm or deny any such rumours, suitable rumours can be seeded which allow the competitors to gain an advantage.

/JB

How so in cases such as this regarding a potential incorrect assertion of fact? Again, I'm only saying it should be done for major rumors. Not every little thing. And only things which could be potential stock manipulation.

--Pat
PatNY is offline