Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul
And what evidence do you have to support that fact?
If Samsung didn't provide sufficient evidence to convince the jury that Apple wouldn't have been able to make up supply, why should the jury decide that they couldn't?
|
The evidence of their own words in the interviews. This only arose because the jurors said they felt that Apple wouldn't have the components.
http://www.iphonehacks.com/2012/08/a...terviewed.html
Quote:
|
Hogan however said that they felt $2.5 billion that Apple was seeking was "extraordinarily high" as it was unclear whether Apple would have been able to sell more iPhones due to the supply constraints it was facing.
|
As Silis points out, having said that you would expect them to apply it in their calculation of damages. But they didn't. Those were based on the percentage profit that Samsung would have made on the sale of all the accused devices (see above).
Graham