|
There's no objective legal standard of "adversely" affected, nor is a definition even offered in the statute. So this is something that must be litigated on a case-by-case basis.
I agree, if you're not visually impaired, you're on questionable ground. On the other hand, you can still be adversely affected by the disabling of TTS; indeed, Amazon markets TTS as a feature to everyone, not something specifically for the visually impaired.
|