Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant
(1) No.
(2) Makes no difference.
(3) No.
If Giggleton bought a second-hand copy of the book (rather than borrowing it from a library) that they either retained or destroyed, I would say
(1) Yes.
(2) Makes no difference.
(3) No.
|
Before a law change in Sweden 2005 both scenarios would have been legal. After 2005 is is not legal to copy a whole book in either of the scenarios.