View Single Post
Old 12-13-2009, 10:44 PM   #3
wallcraft
reader
wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
wallcraft's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,975
Karma: 5183568
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mississippi, USA
Device: Kindle 3, Kobo Glo HD
For a methodology for comparing PDF capabilities, see eBook Reader PDF Capabilities which is used in the E-book Reader Matrix. So far, this row is blank for the Nook.

Many EInk devices are using mobile Adobe Digital Editions for PDFs, but there can still be a huge difference in capabilities. The worst are the Kindles, and a Sony PRS-300 is typical for a basic device with:
Quote:
Full Page; Landscape; Single Page Reflow; Table of Contents; Hyperlinks;
The PocketBooks are currently best of the ADE-based devices, with:
Quote:
Full Page Continuous; Landscape Continuous; Two Column; Manual Crop Margins; Autocrop Margins; Single Page Reflow; Zoom Images in Reflow (?); Table of Contents; Hyperlinks; Text Search; Dictionary Lookup;
So far I have seen little difference in the single-page reflow capability between devices. This may mean that reflow has not improved since the old mobile ADE version in the Sony devices, or that the lack of a screenshot capability on most EInk Readers make differences hard to document. The easily documented difference is the number of font sizes in reflow.
wallcraft is offline   Reply With Quote