View Single Post
Old 01-17-2011, 02:47 PM   #13
leebase
Karma Kameleon
leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.leebase ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
leebase's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,934
Karma: 26616647
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: iPad Mini, iPhone X, Kindle Fire Tab HD 8, Walmart Onn
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATimson View Post
And if Amazon wants to lose $1 on each copy of the app, why shouldn't they be allowed to?
Perhaps a developer doesn't want the market value of all apps to be set at $1. After Amazon buys up marketshare, than Amazon can stop subsidizing the app price, and now the developer will only get $.70 for his apps.

Customers loose too as developers stop putting the kind of effort to creat more than a fart app because they can't sell them for the price that makes them worth developing.

Lee
leebase is offline   Reply With Quote