View Single Post
Old 11-20-2009, 05:29 PM   #11
ardeegee
Maratus speciosus butt
ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ardeegee ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
ardeegee's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,292
Karma: 1162698
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-350
A study that came out yesterday suggesting-- amongst other things-- that the extinction of mammoths and mastodons led to a big shift in plant abundances, reminded me of another good book from a few years back. The ideas in it are mostly speculation, but it is interesting and plausible speculation.

The Ghosts of Evolution:

http://www.amazon.com/Ghosts-Evoluti.../dp/0465005527

http://books.google.com/books?id=7-r...age&q=&f=false

Some of the coverage of the study I mentioned:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1120/p02s13-usgn.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34046350...ience-science/
ardeegee is offline   Reply With Quote