View Single Post
Old 09-29-2013, 11:12 PM   #12
GrannyGrump
Obsessively Dedicated...
GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GrannyGrump ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
GrannyGrump's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,200
Karma: 34977896
Join Date: May 2011
Location: JAPAN (US expatriate)
Device: Sony PRS-T2, ADE on PC
@GMcG
Thanks for the additional testing. I will experiment with a larger test-base to see if my percentages come down---I only checked with 5 images.

I do usually use png, because jpeg seems to spit and spray a lot of pixels around, so there is often a faint halo of "outliers" around the edges and lines of line drawings. In this case though, I went with jpeg with a compression rate of 30%, and because the dimensions of the images are so small, the halos are not noticeable.

Thanks for the recommendation for IrfanView. I have it on my drive, but have mostly only used it for viewing -- the thumbnail view is useful. I am chicken about batch-processing. I will get brave when I get ready to finalize my current batch of 330 images!
GrannyGrump is offline   Reply With Quote