|
@kiwidude, I'll join you in confusion. When I ran the check originally it was against my whole library. In my initial post here I quoted only the lines directly relevant to one book, as an example. What I neglected to do, mostly because I had not remembered the scope option, was to run the check against one book and provide the full log for that. At that point the PI was catching a whole lot of books, most with one or two 'broken' images. That was the log that I PM'ed you which apparently you (quite reasonably) took to be the log for the single book I had also PM'ed you.
When you posted the debug version of the PI I installed it and followed your instructions to run the check against the test book. Which, as you noted, found exactly what you expected. Then I ran it against the book I had PM'ed you and forwarded that log. The only difference that I can tell is that when I ran the check with the non-debug PI it finds a problem but the debug version does not. Which I'm sure makes even less sense to you than it does to me. I'll try re-installing the non-debug version of the PI and run it on that book only, and let you know what happens.
|