Quote:
Originally Posted by afv011
Certainly more effort was spent ranting and insulting in your post than would be required for posting a link. Way to go.
BBC link |
That's a wrong link, I'm afraid. Maybe you've searched wrong internet?
Look what BBC says:
Quote:
Apple had offered to pay a Frand-set fee going forward and was willing to pay a similar rate for past infringements. But it lost the case because it tried to retain the right to contest the validity of the patent with a view to past damages.
It tried to do this because Motorola had defended its right to charge an above-Frand rate for Apple's use of its technology over the past four years. This could have been many times higher than the rate Apple was willing to pay and potentially very expensive.
|