View Single Post
Old 04-15-2010, 08:27 PM   #6
dmaul1114
Wizard
dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.dmaul1114 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,300
Karma: 1121709
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Amazon Kindle 1
Yeah, that's why I don't like it as it starts a precedent, of restricting things based on content.

When they've not done that with music or movies sold in the iTunes store etc. (well no Porn, but don't ban R rated movies etc.).

I don't like the App rejection stuff period, but could do with it as I just have basic app needs--network video players, newspapers, weather, pdf readers, comic readers etc.

So I can deal with some apps getting rejected as they're apps I wouldn't use anyway as my needs are already covered by what's out--and I can't think of any type of app I'd want that is likely to get rejected. It sucks for developers and I don't like it, but in the end that doesn't affect me much.

But if they want to start limiting things based on content....that's setting a dangerous precedent.
dmaul1114 is offline   Reply With Quote