Quote:
Originally Posted by kovidgoyal
As for the question of extensions, I think having one extension with various incompatible DRM schemes is an excellent thing. The time of ebooks and EPUB has come, nothing is going to stop them. This sort of craziness will hurt only one thig, DRM.
|
The problem, though, is that the same extension is also used for DRM-free ePubs. Perhaps we should use .epubf (or .fpub) for DRM-free ePubs and not worry about what the DRM vendors are doing. We would then need a logo and icon for DRM-free ePubs. This is =X='s branding point, but I don't see IDPF as likely to take the lead.