View Single Post
Old 10-04-2007, 04:26 PM   #21
NatCh
Gizmologist
NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.NatCh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
NatCh's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,615
Karma: 929550
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Republic of Texas Embassy at Jackson, TN
Device: Pocketbook Touch HD3
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingle View Post
The fact of the matter is that the law only penalizes actual infringement - there's no codified crime of "attempted distribution".
Exactly, but in this case, the posting of the material is effectively the distribution. Whether or not anyone actually downloads it doesn't affect the fact that the poster deliberately posted a file where it could be downloaded. If the file were never posted, it couldn't be downloaded. That's why I see the posting itself as the defining act of "distribution."

That's what I was trying to get at ... rather clumsily, as it happened.
NatCh is offline   Reply With Quote