View Single Post
Old 04-13-2012, 04:10 PM   #68
afv011
Captain Penguin
afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
afv011's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,947
Karma: 2077653593
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Nook Glowlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
Because with eInk readers time spent reading is irrelevant, what uses power is changing pages. If you read fast, and change pages often, the battery will last less hours than if you read slowly and change pages less often.
When eInk readers were introduced, battery life was described by number of page turns, but that wasn't 'user friendly' enough, so they invented a 'lasts X weeks' calculation based on a standard reading speed. 1 turn a minute for 150 hours is 9000 page turns, which from memory is about what the PRS-505 claimed when it was introduced.
It used to be that they quoted based on 1 hours reading per day, but as battery life dropped, they changed to use 1/2 hour instead, so they could still claim months of battery life.
A device with an active light, however, does use power all the time it is on.
Who reads for 1/2 an hour a day every day?
Still, your premise that you get only 15 hours of continuous reading is wrong, you certainly get more - the nook touch gets 2.5 times as much (150 hours as opposed to 60), and the same should apply with the light, though maybe not to the same degree (x2.5) - but still certainly more than 15 hours.
afv011 is offline   Reply With Quote