Quote:
Originally Posted by PKFFW
Didn't some British organisation recently admit to massaging results, including flawed data or omitting good data they didn't like, defrauding the peer review process and a bunch of other questionable things with regards to climate change science?
|
That was the climate research unit at the University of East Anglia. They were accused of having done these things, but cleared by an independent investigation (although the investigation did find that the unit had a "culture of withholding information"). Wiki article about it
here.