View Single Post
Old 01-09-2012, 02:26 PM   #34
Ken Maltby
Wizard
Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ken Maltby ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Ken Maltby's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,465
Karma: 6900052
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Heart of Texas
Device: Boox Note2, AuraHD, PDA,
It does look like the power requirements of a dedicated simplified eReader could someday
get that low. But keep in mind:

1 Square Inch = 0.00064516 Square Meters

The max solar energy reaching the surface of the earth is ~1kw (1,361w)per square Meter.

My 5" eReader = 12 square inches = 0.00774192 square Meters

0.00774192 x 1000W = 7.74192W

About 8W, sounds good right? But, the drop off from perfect collection conditions is
steep and no solar panel tech is 100% efficient. The PV sites will claim 10 or 11 Watts
per square foot of an array. (That is the most reputable of them.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell#Efficiency

Notice that the best cells, outside the lab, are 35% efficient or less.

.35 x 8W = 2.8W, if the panel could intercept the max total solar.

My battery pack holds a little over 11wh so if we said it was 12wh and the panel could
provide 3W then four hours in perfect sun should charge the device.

So, maybe.

Luck;
Ken
Ken Maltby is offline   Reply With Quote