View Single Post
Old 10-08-2012, 01:17 PM   #29
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,725
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hellmark View Post
Because private sale is legally seen as something different than commercial sale.
That isn't the case in the UK regarding copyright infringement (by actually making copies). Making a copy for sale is a criminal offence, whether it is a private sale or in the course of a business.
That doesn't mean that the same would apply here though.
I think parallel importation is dealt with as a trademark issue rather a copyright one in the UK/EU, and there infringement does require that the act be carried out on a commercial basis.
In that case, someone selling a game they have imported and played to GameStop would be ok, but GameStop could not legally resell that game.

Last edited by murraypaul; 10-08-2012 at 01:28 PM.
murraypaul is offline