View Single Post
Old 01-16-2013, 09:36 AM   #58
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
You can't really run a business with that policy. Denying all incorrect rumours effectively confirms all true ones. This would allow competitors, by seeding of rumours, do determine a company's direction, financial situation, etc.

/JB
Again, not ALL incorrect rumors. Simply significant ones regarding incorrect assertions of fact that have the potential to impact their stock prices greatly.

I am not the only one asking this question. Others writing on the "rumor" of the decreased orders have also asked it. For example, here:

http://gizmodo.com/5976163/yes-apple...?post=56225033

--Pat
PatNY is offline