|
Yes, I have read the article.
To repeat, I believe that Ms. Rowling has to fight this case to protect her trademarks. She really has no choice but to do so, regardless of the "rights" or "wrongs" of the situation. That's just what you have to do in trademark violation cases. Even if she loses the case, she will still have acted to defend the trademarks, and that's the important thing.
In what way do Ms. Rowling's books "deprive anyone of their income"? Your logic escapes me there, I'm afraid.
|