View Single Post
Old 05-02-2013, 11:45 AM   #9
Hamlet53
Nameless Being
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by paola View Post
yep, I wonder whether we should have subdivided this period in at least two chunks: there so much going on in literature in that century.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bookpossum View Post
Well, we could presumably decide to do that still - just have a run-off vote for 1801-1850 or 1851-1900. Would that be feasible?
Actually my comment was more about the idea that the 20th Century was too finely subdivided. I do agree that the 19th Century is very fertile for a lot of great literature, and have no problem with it winning.
  Reply With Quote