View Single Post
Old 10-27-2010, 01:12 PM   #8
cjottawa
Tempus fugit.
cjottawa has learned how to read e-bookscjottawa has learned how to read e-bookscjottawa has learned how to read e-bookscjottawa has learned how to read e-bookscjottawa has learned how to read e-bookscjottawa has learned how to read e-bookscjottawa has learned how to read e-bookscjottawa has learned how to read e-books
 
Posts: 91
Karma: 911
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Keyboard
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Irving View Post
...the policy is exactly the same as B&N's, which means that the whole thing is controlled by the publishers who allow the lending. Otherwise I'm sure Amazon would throw in a little extra to stick it to the competition.
That is a plausible reason but not the only possibility.

Amazon may have made this change so as to remove one of Barnes & Noble's competitive advantages.

If Barnes & Nobel continues to offer the same lending policy, Amazon needn't do anything further.

For B&N to market lending as a competitive feature, they have to up the ante and offer more - longer lending or multiple loans.

That may cause additional financial hardship to B&N or put them in poor standings with their supplier-publishers, assuming it isn't publishers setting the limits, as you've rightly suggested may be the case.

It's an excellent tactical move on Amazon's part.
cjottawa is offline   Reply With Quote