View Single Post
Old 02-18-2012, 06:10 PM   #12
mtravellerh
book creator
mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.mtravellerh ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
mtravellerh's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,635
Karma: 3856660
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Luxembourg
Device: PB360°
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
For the love of heaven, people...

The Nook (or ADE, etc.) thought that the ".em" was a new STYLE.

That's all. Just like any other class style decoration that starts with a "."

That's it, no big mystery. It would have ignored everything after that as being malformed because the ending brackets were missing from the previous style (if you try reading this line-by-line, as a device would) and the opening brackets were missing from "style .em"

That's all. The return, occuring before the ".," caused the ruckus.

Hitch
exactly. always a good idea to check css manually, btw
mtravellerh is offline   Reply With Quote