Thread: Seriousness The concept of 'TIME'
View Single Post
Old 08-23-2010, 07:55 AM   #47
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,544
Karma: 93383043
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
It is an interesting conundrum which really crosses the line between between physics and philosophy as to why it is that we can travel in space, but not in time (other than in one direction, and at a fixed speed. General Relativity describes the universe as consisting of 4 dimensional spacetime - 3 dimensions of space, 1 of time - and there's nothing "different" about the time dimension; it's mathematically equivalent to the spacial ones. And yet we can easily travel through the spacial dimensions, but not at all easily through the temporal dimension. Nobody really knows why that is.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote