View Single Post
Old 09-28-2012, 02:06 PM   #17
afv011
Captain Penguin
afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.afv011 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
afv011's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,947
Karma: 2077653593
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Nook Glowlight
Quote:
Originally Posted by calvin-c View Post
If they were that smart they wouldn't be Apple owners! But seriously, Apple didn't sue until Amazon dropped the 'for Android' part of their name. I can see where it might be confusing, but no worse than any other competition. Have you ever bought a game 'for your PC' and discovered later it was for the Wii or Xbox or something? If it cost enough to be worth the effort you just return it. And if you can afford an Apple product then you shouldn't be concerned about losing the minor amount most apps cost.
Trying to restrict the use of "appstore" or "app store" is ridiculous. Analogous to attempting to restrict the use of "grocery store" or "liquor store". And the fact that both the current and former CEOs used the term "app store" to refer to competing app stores did not help their case.
afv011 is offline   Reply With Quote