View Single Post
Old 08-25-2014, 07:50 PM   #68
Barcey
Wizard
Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Barcey's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,531
Karma: 8059866
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo H2O / Aura HD / Glo / iPad3
Quote:
Originally Posted by twowheels View Post
Because then you wouldn't know if the difference was related to differences in the texts, and you obviously couldn't use the same text twice.
Not sure what the difference in the texts would have to do with it. To be clear what I meant was you would do the following:
1) 25% of the users would read Story A on paper and then Story B on e-ink
2) 25% of the users would read Story A on e-ink and then Story B on paper
3) 25% of the users would read Story B on paper and then Story A on e-ink
4) 25% of the users would read Story B on e-ink and then Story A on paper

All readers should already be familiar with reading on e-ink technology to remove the distraction of a new technology. If the goal is to determine if you retain more information on paper or e-ink then that would be a much more logical approach. With the approach that was taken there are a lot more variables and with such a small sample size the results are meaningless.
Barcey is offline   Reply With Quote