View Single Post
Old 01-09-2008, 09:41 AM   #94
Steven Lyle Jordan
Grand Sorcerer
Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Steven Lyle Jordan ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Steven Lyle Jordan's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,478
Karma: 5171130
Join Date: Jan 2006
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
Why. I tale the image to be able to look at it ("read") later.

The laws in Sweden was changed a couple of years ago so now it is illegal to download copyrighted material. But it is copyright infringent or something similar that is the crime. It is not theft. And it is not theft in the US or UK according to what people have written about the laws in these countries here.
So, we're back to the "copyright infringement is not theft" discussion, eh?

Fine. My point is, downloading digital material that is not authorized to be available is illegal. Swedish law (as cited by Alexander's link) clearly states that:

Quote:
According to the new legislation copies and hence downloads derived from "copies/originals to which access has been made available illegally" will be prohibited.
It says nothing about who made the files available illegally... just that, if they are illegally available, you do not have the right to download them... not even for personal use. So, by your description of your example, you are clearly breaking the law. By my description of your example, you are clearly breaking the law. Call it what you will.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
You get a monopol to distribute intellectual property. It is the monopol that has value. Why confuse the monopol with the intellectual item?
No... the intellectual item has the value. The monopol secures the legal right to distribute and protect the intellectual item.

Last edited by Steven Lyle Jordan; 01-09-2008 at 03:45 PM.
Steven Lyle Jordan is offline   Reply With Quote