Quote:
Originally Posted by PatNY
While the two buildings don't look "exactly" the same, the Apple clone is extremely derivative of prior designs, ripping-off the most prominent features of two well-known architectural masterpieces. Which wouldn't be so bad if they hadn't had the gall to patent the design. It's laughable.
If you can't see it, you're not very observant about architecture, nor are you very objective.
--Pat
|
Sigh...
You've missed the whole point about the distinctions between inspiration and blatant copying.
As this was one of the main items being discussed, I can only assume that you missed some of the posts, got bored, or speed read the posts.
You're not a Twitter user are you by any chance?