Thread: A bit of Karma..... [Apple must run Did not Copy Ads in Britain]
View Single Post
Old 11-04-2012, 05:23 PM   #99
j.p.s
Grand Sorcerer
j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 5,278
Karma: 98804578
Join Date: Apr 2011
Device: pb360
Quote:
Originally Posted by frahse View Post
Those good old boys over in the home country, with the powdered wigs, don't mess around. They got no first amendment over there.
A lot of heads went up on pikes on that bridge for that kind of insolence and foot dragging.
It was Apple that ran crying to the UK court system looking for redress of Samsung's imagined infringement of Apple's Imaginary Property.

They also ran crying to Mexican courts claiming that iFone's 2003 trademark is confusing with Apple's 2007 iPhone trademark.

If Apple want compensation for confusion caused by others, why should they expect to cause confusion with impunity?
j.p.s is offline   Reply With Quote