|
The legal case against Armstrong in any common law jurisdiction is straightforward, as it ought to be. He induced people to buy the book through the deliberately fraudulent misrepresentation of the fundamental facts about his career and his success. It may also constitute (in Australia) misleading conduct in trade or commerce under vthe Trade Practices Act.
The case against the publishers is much less clear, and would depend upon the extent of their prior knowledge.
The book stands in a different position to autobiographies which conceal or distort or misrepresent the truth, even deliberately; as people have said, you're a dill if you expect the truth in an autobiography.
The whole point of this book was not the autobiography - it was the courageous drug-free battle. If he had admitted taking drugs, then the whole premise of the book - and hence the book - disappeared.
|