Quote:
Originally Posted by Moejoe
How can you not see something wrong in this?
|
Because nothing about what B&N (or Amazon or Sony) is doing prevents anyone from getting non-DRM'ed versions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moejoe
I suppose you see nothing wrong with Disney's everlasting copyright on Mickey Mouse? Or the sneaky trademarking of authors names and characters to stop said authors' works going into the PD?
|
Yeah, I don't really have a problem with Mickey Mouse staying out of the public domain. I'd prefer that exceptions had been made for certain characters rather than everything getting a 20-year copyright extension over the previous laws, but I'm not going to pull my hair out over it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moejoe
And yes, you're right, there's no 'requirement' under law, but there is a cultural conscience that even the lowest of the low companies might want follow. Placing a lock on something that has been freed is a terrible and shameful act.
|
Are we talking about e-books or wolves?
There is no "cultural conscience," just your dislike for DRM. Since adding DRM to a single version has zero effect on other versions, I fail to see any problem at all here.