View Single Post
Old 08-26-2012, 03:51 PM   #139
djulian
Evangelist
djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.djulian ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
djulian's Avatar
 
Posts: 408
Karma: 1786912
Join Date: Nov 2010
Device: Kindle Voyage
Ran across this in the news today and thought it was relevant to the discussion over whether or not erotic literature affects sexual behavior.

http://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/l...rned-1-4857055

Disregarding the question of censorship and banning or burning books, which I do not support, I thought the relevant quote to our discussion was the sexual aid retailer who noted (at the end of the article) the increase in sales of blindfolds, restraints, whips & crops, etc. This seems to be a pretty fair bit of anecdotal support for the idea that sexual literature affects people's sexual behavior.
djulian is offline   Reply With Quote