What I'm saying is that identical twins
start with the same genome. If you claim something different you are welcome to provide proof. You are just being argumentative and cantankerous as usual.
The conclusion from the first article:
Quote:
The differences between identical twins increase as they age, because environmentally triggered changes accumulate. But twins can also begin their lives with differences, according to Bruder's study, and that calls into question their very name.
"Maybe we shouldn't call them identical twins," Harvard's Bieber says. "We should call them 'one-egg twins.'"
|
and from the second:
Quote:
|
SAN FRANCISCO – Identical twins may not be so identical after all. Even though identical twins supposedly share all of their DNA, they acquire hundreds of genetic changes early in development that could set them on different paths, according to new research.
|
bolding mine