Quote:
Originally Posted by soilwork
I agree that the photo looks quite promising and I am anxiously waiting for users' hands-on review.
But to point out one thing, only Ectaco claim that JC has 1600 * 1200 resolution but not Hanvon. Hanvon do not claim C920 (which JC is based on) has 1600*1200 resolution. Hanvon advertise the 1600 * 1200 (with 200dpi) resolution for their greyscale version (E920), though. You can compare the information on two devices here.
http://www.hanvon.com/en/products/eb...ucts-C920.html
http://www.hanvon.com/en/products/eb...ucts-E920.html
If Hanvon C920 (which JC is based on) can actually display 1600 * 1200 resolution, I guess Hanvon would have advertised it as well, so I am a bit skeptical about Ectaco's claim. |
Someone on the russian board also noticed, that one can't find the resolution on the product page. I watched this video recently and at 1:48 the asian representative says 1600x1200 (the other both misunderstood her
):
Well, let us wait a week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PF4Mobile
Why are you assuming that displaying the characters means that they are readable? You might see exactly what the camera say...that is not much |
Then it would be very difficult to sell the device on chinese market. Wait, that's why they are exporting all their rebranded stocks to the west!