Thread: 0.6 Beta take 3 (0.5.906)
View Single Post
Old 10-05-2012, 10:43 PM   #111
st_albert
Guru
st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'st_albert gives new meaning to the word 'superlative.'
 
Posts: 696
Karma: 150000
Join Date: Feb 2010
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by theducks View Post
I still think a save 'as is' is needed.
It would not hurt, as long as the consequences were well understood, in the case of saving a corrupt file. (How about giving the option to rename the saved file?)

Save often, under different filenames as necessary. Especially before you try something experimental.

Then, Sigil should provide the options to "recover the crashed file" or not. In the latter case, open the last-saved, known-valid file.

JMHO!
st_albert is offline