View Single Post
Old 09-08-2014, 10:50 PM   #38
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,422
Karma: 85397180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Yes, it very much does. Qt5 does not run on older OS X and it does run well on XP. So yes, it is a Qt4 issue and your taking out Qt4 comparability just means you don't care. You are now telling people who have use Calibre 1.48 for one reason or another that they can no longer use your plugin. You are also telling people on XP who upgraded to Calibre 2.0 and your newest plugin that if they go back to Calibre 1.48, they can no longer use your plugin. What you are doing is now taking your plugin away from these people.

Switching from an older version of OS X or XP to some version Linux is not an option and it's not even a valid suggestion.
Lets just be very clear that it is his plugin and he may do whatever he wants. And if his plugin needed calibre2.x features to thrive, then it sucks to be an XP user.

Since it doesn't, I don't see the harm in allowing its use... but that is a different issue. And the developer is still king and can literally do whatever the hell he wants with it.

Also while we are at it, why don't we confuse calibre 2.x with Qt5?

Regarding linux as "not an option and not even a valid suggestion", please take your insensitive foulness elsewhere, you are helping nothing.
(And I have already explained a far more reasonable perspective on that issue.)
eschwartz is offline