View Single Post
Old 09-07-2014, 12:55 AM   #35
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,422
Karma: 85397180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaltonST View Post
The user of Derive Genres who reported the Calibre 2.2.0 issue to me in the first place discovered it while using a Mac.

As for free XP replacements without buying a new pc:

As for keeping XP but running Calibre 2.2.0 within an Ubuntu virtual machine inside of XP: http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/virtualbox

And for those who have or can get a new or used ChromeBook very cheaply, you can install a full fledged Linux on the Chromebook hardware using https://github.com/dnschneid/crouton

Craigslist has old PCs for $50 that can be reformatted to run Ubuntu and used as a Calibre 2.2+ device. http://sfbay.craigslist.org/search/sys?maxAsk=50

There are almost always options, although granted that they require some effort.

So, I am sanguine about where Derive Genres and my other 2 plugins are positioned viz a viz Calibre 1.48.
Not everyone is comfortable with installing another OS on their computer. Very often they are not even comfortable with having me do it for them.
A Windows user is probably more prone to that also.

A much simpler solution would be for you to simply mark your plugin as compatible with older versions -- since it is. Of course, it is your plugin and you may do whatever you wish with it, but I fail to see what purpose there is in doing so. You are not using any code which requires 2.2, so who benefits when you go out of your way to mark it to require 2.2?

Regarding the bug reporter discovering it on a Mac: as I assume you have more than one user, I am unsure what you are trying to say.

I truly admire your caring and friendly approach to tech support and interaction with the online community. </sarcasm>

Also, perhaps you should keep in mind that not everything is a personal attack on you.

Last edited by eschwartz; 09-07-2014 at 01:00 AM.
eschwartz is offline