View Single Post
Old 09-04-2008, 03:21 PM   #3
Nate the great
Sir Penguin of Edinburgh
Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Nate the great's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,375
Karma: 23555235
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DC Metro area
Device: Shake a stick plus 1
The state of California does claim copyright on its legal code, yes. But if an infringement case ever goes before a judge it will be laughed out of court.

Plus, there is an activist pushing the issue, so in the not too distant future CA will abandon that ludicrous idea (just like Oregon dropped its claim of copyright).

Interesting side note.
There is a legal principle in the USA: "ignorance of the law is no excuse" becuase the law is not kept hidden. It is a public document; if you didn't read it that's your problem. If CA can claim copyright, then it can deny anyone from distributing the law code. Ignorance would be a valid defense in court.
Nate the great is offline   Reply With Quote